Posts Tagged ‘limbaugh

16
Feb
09

Stimulus Debate Revealing Republicans To Be Out Of Touch Crackheads – But What’s New?

The ugly last few weeks of stimulus debate among our nation’s leadership has left one thing clear: Congress has essentially become a douchey, senior-citizen version of The Real World mixed with Laguna Beach. Seriously. We basically a geriatric high school with bitches galore  and those lame duck leaders have abdicated any sense of responsibility to the American citizen as they are solely focused on the next election – which is especially true in the case of the Republicans.

Anyone who has taken Psych 101 (me) has likely been watching with jaws on the floor the Right Wing Parade of crackhead after crackhead. Singular focus on electoral demographics has allowed them to form some insane force field of failed ideology divorcing almost the entire Republican leadership from reality. To repeat the words of John Judis in The New Republic, “Congressional Republicans either don’t know any economics or are willing to put the country at risk to advance their own party’s fortune.” I’d go with both.

In case you’ve been under a rock, here’s the deal, pickle. The country is hemorrhaging jobs – almost 5 million Americans are collecting unemployment benefits, which doesn’t include all the unemployed who are not collecting benefits, nor those who are underemployed because their hours have been cut. Temporary jobs – an indicator of economic health – have all but dried up. The wealth of the average American family is now less than it was in 2001. And the second wave of mortgage defaults is starting to hit the country, because option ARMS are beginning to hit their due dates for interest rate increases. AND, and – the country’s top intelligence officer says the global economic crisis poses a greater threat to U.S. stability than terrorism.

You got it? Good.

Now, what are the crackhead Republicans suggesting will fix this crisis? It they spend most of their whining about the lack bipartisanship (which is odd considering Bush only met with Dems 3 times during his administration and Limbaugh equates talking to Dems to talking to snakes…), hoping the president fails, attempting to obstruct any potential solution to the problem and creating fun, new, misleading terms like “generational theft.” Would you expect any different from a group of people who values the opinions of the likes of Newt Gingrich, Tom Delay, Joe the Plumber, and Rush Limbaugh? Right.

Somehow, you’d think right wing leaders smart enough to reach national office would be able to acknowledge the reality of the situation and choose to address these issues with realistic proposals instead of ideology proven to not only fail, but worsen the country’s economic troubles. You’d be wrong. Repub leaders have decided – as though they live in bizarro world – that if they oppose the stimulus and the stimulus fails, they can ride it all the way to victory in 2010. How wonderful of them to lift their collective, wrinkled middle finger to the lower 95 percent of America’s economic class.

And just to appear as though someone told them if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the what? Problem!, they are attempting to present a few weak ass proposals of their own: corporate tax cuts, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and payroll tax cuts.

Let’s address these “ideas.” First of all, government spending stimulates the economy much faster than tax cuts. Remember how much tax cuts for the wealthy helped over the last 8 years? The wealth was hoarded at the top and did not trickle down. The top 400 wealthiest Americans doubled their wealth, the poverty class grew while the middle shrunk drastically and jobs dried up.

Next, let’s take a look at corporate taxes. Republicans love to wave their hands in the air, shouting about America’s record corporate tax cuts. As they well know, because of the myriad of loopholes in tax legislation, the majority of U.S. corporations do not pay federal taxes. Therefore, lessening the tax burden on businesses that don’t pay taxes anyway will have zippo improvements on the economy. Are you paying attention Hatch? McConnell? Cantor? Boehner? Or your heads too far up your ass to hear me?

And lastly, payroll taxes are a good idea – but not by themselves. As with the stimulus checks Bush sent out last year, Americans are saving or paying down debt with any extra buck that comes their way – not shopping. Without consumers spending, businesses cannot stay afloat, retain employees and no reduction in payroll taxes will reverse that trend.

Which leave job creation as the strongest ladder out of this quagmire. Yet, Republicans, cuddled in their failed ideology and refusing to acknowledge data, evidence and reason started harping on every little non-roads related portion of the stimulus bill. Condom distribution, for example, was one of their main target. Yet, condom makers, condom packagers, and companies who ship the condoms will be stimulated. I could answer in much the same way with every “earmark” the Republicans attacked with unhelpful rhetoric, like “porkulus.”

Paul Begala had a good idea in his address to South Carolina Gov. Sanford, who opposes the stimulus, “If Republican politicians are so deeply opposed to President Obama’s economic recovery plan, they should refuse to take the money. After all, if you think all that federal spending is damaging, there are easy ways to reduce it: Don’t take federal money.” We’ll see how many uneducated poor – or, as I like to call them, Limbaugh listeners – turn out to vote for Repubs in 2010 in the areas where they looked to corporate tax cuts to help them out of the economic rut.

Bush proved what a detriment it is to cloak decision-making in political ideology alone. Data, information, logic, evidence must be understood and solutions cannot simply stand on theory – especially after the data show that theory has already failed. It is a desperate shame Republican leadership only cares about election returns and refuses to learn the lessons of the past. It seems so elementary and yet they fail to grasp the most simplest of realities. I’m sure  Republicans willing to work with Democrats, like Crist, Snowe, Spector, Collins, and all the  mayors who are seeing the jobs dry up right before their eyes will probably do okay the next election go ’round.

But with each new report about massive layoffs – that are weekly now – most Republicans will find that the only thing they know how to do, obstruct, will begin to sour among those feeling the pinch. Which is everybody. The Right wingers thought they were getting a little traction by throwing mud in Obama’s eye – but reality is hard to overcome and the Republicans have no solutions to our national problems, no helpful manners, and are making no improvements. To say they are a party of the past is putting it kindly. And I’m hoping all their bitchy congress people fail out come the end of this term.

11
Sep
08

The Use of Incendiary Language

There is a lot of discussion in the blogosphere about the language we use and opinions we make regarding its benefits in attracting Independent and Undecided voters to our respective sides. I’d like to address this concern.

As a blogger who takes herself only slightly seriously, I have to address my growing use of incendiary language. Let me preface this by saying that my familial roots are in Southern Louisiana. We know how to have a good time and tell it like its (ahem, I mean “it is.”). I’m not especially diplomatic, meaning I don’t beat around the bush when I have something to say. This doesn’t mean I’m an ogre – I’m totally fun – but I don’t feel that need for the approval of others that inhibits we Americans in our thoughts and speech.

Basically, we fear offending people. This “Can’t we just get along?” and “Uniter” feelgood kumbayah stuff has infiltrated our culture almost to the point of paralyzing progress on a social and political scale – and this is having an effect on our democracy and our economy.

Democrats suffer from this condition in spades. Lefties tend to use temperate and inclusive language that is interpreted as mealy-mouthed and weak. Just turn on your television and watch Obama “fight” back against the attacks by McCain and Palin – many of which are ridiculous, false, even perverse and EASILY disputed. Yet Obama plods along on policy, which is great unless you’re trying to win a presidential election. Democrats across the country are shuddering with memories of Gore and Kerry as Obama “uhs” and “ahs” through the campaign trail.

Republicans on the other hand have introduced Sarah Palin, a completely lacking candidate picked with very little deliberation and consideration. This woman should be nowhere near the 3 a.m. phone call or the red button, but she’s got spunk and charisma and the voters are flocking to her like moths to that light that electrocutes and kills them.

Consider Rush Limbaugh – on the air 20 years, Ann Coulter – a regular on the bestseller lists, Bill O’Reilly – tricks people into forgetting about his own lack of credibility (he was the Inside Edition host) and enjoys healthy ratings. For the most part, these people are off their rocker. They could not be farther from their rocker. If their rocker was the pope, they are the chap-wearing transvestites at Brazil’s Carnival. Yet, seemingly against all logic and reason, these incendiary Right Wing commentators have a vast sea of fans and believers. Because of the language the use and the manner with which they use it.

Furthermore, too many times, we allow political correctness to guide are efforts to produce progress, causing us to fail. The Suffragettes didn’t care if they angered people with their opinion. Or, if they did care, they angered those sonsabitches anyway! The Civil Rights movement gained strength by being confrontational, shaking people out of their comfort zones. In today’s day and age, we give religion privilege to the detriment of our freedoms and the health of our democracy. It is time those of us who do not heed incredible tales of walking on water and the existence of Hell to voice our opinion and stand together against the domination of organized religion. To do that, we must make people uncomfortable with our honesty and refusal to keep politics and religion “out of the conversation.” We’re coming to a crossroads with people wanting to change our democracy into a theocracy – and I will not hold my tongue.

Now, I don’t think we should use incendiary language for the sake of gaining support. Much more reasonably-written blogs receive much more attention than this one. But four-letter words and calling a spade a spade come naturally to me. The lies hurled incessantly by Republicans need to be fought with strong words – especially by those of us who don’t have to fear losing their jobs for saying what they think (CareerBuilder just released a survey saying one in five bosses screen potential applicants through web searches about them).

If someone is being a jackass, I’m going to call them a jackass – but my words will not be empty. I will always have an informed opinion and be able to back up what I say. I invite intelligent debates, but will defend my views.

I’ve always appreciated the American culture of fake niceness so derided by Europeans. And in a restaurant or in a bookstore – you’ll get a different genuine friendliness we who live in Texas are famous for. But when it comes to public policy, the Cajun is coming out. We’ve allowed the Right Wing to dominate public opinion with lies and Christian Bullshit. I have bullshit repellent and I’m going to use it. And until the more moderate and liberal members of society stand up, take a stand, and have the courage to use words and tones that might be “uncomfortable” for them, we’re going to continue to cede the leadership and our rights to the Right Wing. And that ain’t no lie.

Take off the filter, bring on the honesty and start letting those four-letter words flow like your freedom of speech depends on it! Cause it does.

22
Feb
08

Limbaugh Craziness & Members of Congress Under Investigation

If I decided to post all the insane shite Limbaugh disgorged on his show, I’d be busy from now until his train reaches it’s final destination of Satanville.

In any case, I’m posting these words from yesterday because I don’t know how many of you are located in the South and understand the Republican mentality down here – at least, the old school mentality. Many of the older members of my extended family, who are straight-ticket Republicans who would rather suck on a tail pipe than vote Democrat, feel exactly like this:

The story is that this paper endorsed McCain, sat on this story and now puts it out just prior to McCain wrapping up the nomination. And McCain says he’s disappointed. Why? Why is anybody disappointed or surprised but [sic] this? They are who they are. A snake is a snake. A tiger is a tiger. The New York Times is the New York times. Folks, if you expect me to be angry about the story and angry at the New York Times, you have tuned to the wrong radio show. I refuse to get mad when something I have predicted is going to happen, happens. I refuse to get mad when something I know is true, is true. It is a total waste of energy.

The important question for John McCain today is, is he going to learn the right lesson from this, and what is the lesson? The lesson is liberals are to be defeated. You cannot walk across the aisle with them. You cannot reach across the aisle. You cannot welcome their media members on your bus and get all cozy with them and expect eternal love from them. You are a Republican. Whether you’re a conservative Republican or not, you are a Republican. At some point, the people you cozy up to, either to do legislation or to get cozy media stories, are going to turn on you. They are snakes. If the right lesson is not learned from this, then it will have proved to be of no value. There’s a great opportunity here for Senator McCain to learn the right lesson and understand who his friends are and who his enemies are. He’s had that backwards for way too long. He has thought the New York Times is his friend. He has thought Chris Matthews and these other people in the Drive-By Media are his friends. They aren’t. That’s the lesson today.” – Rush Limbaugh, 2/21/2008

That’s right. Democrats are snakes. Democrats. That’s how the old school Repubs feel here in the South. Those who are in or near my generation are much more open to cooperation and also tend to vote less straight-ticket than the seniors. This gives me a sense that the ugly, extreme partisanship “you’re either with us or against us” attitude is becoming a relic of the past. We’re just so sick of it – which is why Independent numbers are growing.

And, as for the Democrats are snakes comment, here is a count of Congressional Members under investigation. Let’s count. 19 Republicans. In fact, Renzi was indicted this morning. How many Democrats? Oh yeah, 5. Now, of course it sucks that any amount of political leaders might behave unethically, but hellooooooooo – Repubs seem way more naughty than Dems. So, who are snakes? I’m going to try and find numbers on actual indictments on political leaders as well.

So, FYI, old school southern Republicans are crizazy – just like Rush Limbaugh is. And they probably dislike McCain enough to keep their freaky asses at home November 4. Maybe. I won’t say hopefully because I believe EVERYBODY should vote, but it’s something for pundits to take into consideration and anyone who plans to put money on the presidential race.

BTW, even if McCain continues his cow towing to the insane Right base, it only solidifies his flip-flopping past Romney proportions and gives Obama (or Clinton, but probably not) more ammunition during the run-up to the general election.




Scarlet Letter of Atheism

a

Bloggers' Rights at EFF

Blog Stats

  • 96,907 hits
WordPress Political Blogger

Top Clicks

  • None